Attorney Explains Why Jay-Z's Response To The Allegations Against Him Makes Him Appear Guilty — 'He's Messing With The Wrong Tactic'

Attorney Robert D. Sparks insisted that Jay-Z shouldn't have put out such a brazen statement about the lawsuit filed against him.

Jay-Z Tinseltown | Shutterstock
Advertisement

Jay-Z, also known as Shawn Carter, is a rapper and entrepreneur who's become an icon for his influential work both in and out of the music industry, has found himself embroiled in the middle of legal troubles that tie him and Sean "Diddy" Combs to a sexual assault against a young girl in 2000. 

Carter has vehemently denied these allegations, but a popular lawyer named Robert D. Sparks has broken down Carter's response and explained why it wasn't in his best interests to have released it in the first place.

Advertisement

Jay-Z released a statement following the allegations and claimed that they were nothing but false and an 'extortion ploy.'

In a statement provided by his representative and posted on social media, the rapper dismissed the lawsuit as a "blackmail attempt" and attacked the attorney who filed it, Tony Buzbee, vowing to "expose" him as a "fraud" in a "very public fashion." 

Carter's response came after an anonymous accuser, identified only as "Jane Doe," alleged Carter and Combs raped her after she was driven to an MTV Video Music Awards after-party. She was 13 at the time.

According to NBC News, the federal lawsuit was originally filed in October, and Combs was the only listed defendant, but it was recently refiled to include Carter. Carter, who was 30 when the alleged assault happened, called the accusations "heinous in nature."

Advertisement

RELATED: A Clip Of Beyoncé Boasting About Her Love For Jay-Z Has Fans 'Creeped' Out By The Origins Of Their Relationship

The alleged incident took place following the 2000 MTV Video Music Awards.

Jane Doe recalled that she was hanging around Radio City Music Hall during the 2000 MTV Video Music Awards and managed to talk a limousine driver into bringing her to a celebrity-studded party at a private residence after the event. 

In the suit, she said that while she was in the limousine, she was asked to sign a nondisclosure document. 

Advertisement

Once at the party, she claimed she took a drink that made her feel "woozy and lightheaded" and went into a bedroom to lie down.

She then alleged that Combs and Jay-Z barged into the room along with another unnamed celebrity and raped her. The woman said she eventually escaped the room, fled the house, and called for a ride from a nearby gas station. 

Carter vehemently denies these allegations, but many have pointed out that his statement does nothing but paint him in an even uglier light, as brought up by Robert D. Sparks.

RELATED: Researcher Reveals Whether Kurt Cobain Was A ‘Horrible Person’ Or Not

Advertisement

The attorney broke down why Jay-Z's response to the allegations made him appear guilty.

"The thing that pops up is not immediately innocence and guilt, it's 'How did it get this far?' Carter starts attacking Buzbee, saying, 'Hey, you sent me a demand letter,' and, 'He's trying to extort me.' Well, news flash, and Jay-Z's people know this, every lawsuit starts with a demand letter," Sparks pointed out in his TikTok video. 

Sparks explained that everyone gets put on notice that they have a claim, which allows them to resolve it. Sparks acknowledged that he understands why Carter is on the defensive, considering these are serious allegations and that he's being tied to Combs.

@robertsparksattorneys JayZ fired off a response after being named in part of lawsuit Buzbee had brought against Diddy! Will Buzbee use JayZ’s words against him? #news #law #court #attorney #rap ♬ original sound - Robert D Sparks

On the other side of the argument, Sparks insisted that Tony Buzbee, a powerhouse trial attorney out of Houston, Texas, who's taken down "monster verdicts" and just got appointed by the Attorney General to take on investment firms on behalf of Texas, wouldn't just move forward on a lawsuit without solid evidence and confidence of the crime committed. 

Advertisement

"It can't be a bluff," Sparks remarked, and he questioned what Jay-Z was doing by putting out these statements that Buzbee could and would use against him.

"Carter is saying he represents the heinous nature, he understands it, and that it rises to a level that is so bad because it's rape that it should be a criminal prosecution. I could think of nothing better as a trial attorney to use those words against the defendant in a deposition," Sparks continued.

He reiterated that it was a bad idea for Jay-Z to attack Buzbee in his statement because he's a "real heavyweight lawyer" who knows exactly what he's doing, especially in a case like this.

Advertisement

RELATED: Former Prosecutor Explains Why A Prison Sentence For Diddy Is Almost Certainly Inescapable — 'Even Puff Daddy Doesn't Have Enough Money To Make This Go Away'

Nia Tipton is a staff writer with a bachelor’s degree in creative writing and journalism who covers news and lifestyle topics that focus on psychology, relationships, and the human experience.